Site Title
2013 Barton Mens Soccer
G9 vs Lees-McRae College
361
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -360
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
362
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -361
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
363
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -362
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.0, 140 mm
364
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -363
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.0, 140 mm
365
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -364
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 140 mm
366
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -365
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 140 mm
367
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -366
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
368
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -367
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
369
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -368
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
370
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -369
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
371
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -370
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
372
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -371
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
373
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -372
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
374
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -373
ISO 2000, 1/320 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
375
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -374
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 4.5, 130 mm
376
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -375
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 4.5, 130 mm
377
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -376
ISO 2000, 1/320 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
378
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -377
ISO 2000, 1/320 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
379
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -378
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
380
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -379
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 230 mm
381
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -380
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 230 mm
382
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -381
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.0, 180 mm
383
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -382
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.0, 180 mm
384
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -383
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.0, 180 mm
385
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -384
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.0, 180 mm
386
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -385
ISO 2000, 1/200 sec at f / 5.6, 250 mm
387
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -386
ISO 2000, 1/320 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
388
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -387
ISO 2000, 1/320 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
389
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -388
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
390
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -389
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
391
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -390
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
392
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -391
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
393
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -392
ISO 2000, 1/320 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
394
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -393
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
395
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -394
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
396
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -395
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
397
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -396
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
398
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -397
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
399
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -398
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
400
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -399
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
401
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -400
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
402
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -401
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
403
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -402
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
404
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -403
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0, 170 mm
405
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -404
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0, 170 mm
406
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -405
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 170 mm
407
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -406
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0, 170 mm
408
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -407
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.0, 170 mm
409
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -408
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.0, 170 mm
410
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -409
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0, 170 mm
411
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -410
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0, 170 mm
412
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -411
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
413
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -412
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
414
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -413
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
415
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -414
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
416
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -415
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
417
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -416
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
418
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -417
ISO 2000, 1/250 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
419
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -418
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
420
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -419
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
421
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -420
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
422
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -421
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
423
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -422
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
424
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -423
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
425
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -424
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
426
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -425
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
427
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -426
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
428
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -427
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
429
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -428
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
430
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -429
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
431
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -430
ISO 2000, 1/250 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
432
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -431
ISO 2000, 1/250 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm