Site Title
2013 Barton Mens Soccer
G9 vs Lees-McRae College
271
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -270
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
272
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -271
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
273
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -272
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
274
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -273
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
275
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -274
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
276
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -275
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
277
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -276
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
278
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -277
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 4.5, 130 mm
279
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -278
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
280
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -279
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
281
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -280
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
282
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -281
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
283
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -282
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
284
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -283
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
285
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -284
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
286
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -285
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
287
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -286
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
288
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -287
ISO 2000, 1/250 sec at f / 5.6, 400 mm
289
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -288
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
290
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -289
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
291
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -290
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
292
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -291
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
293
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -292
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
294
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -293
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
295
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -294
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
296
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -295
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
297
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -296
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
298
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -297
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
299
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -298
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
300
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -299
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
301
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -300
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
302
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -301
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
303
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -302
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 5.6, 120 mm
304
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -303
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 5.6, 120 mm
305
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -304
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 6.3, 120 mm
306
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -305
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
307
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -306
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
308
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -307
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
309
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -308
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
310
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -309
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
311
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -310
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
312
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -311
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
313
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -312
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
314
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -313
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
315
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -314
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
316
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -315
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
317
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -316
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
318
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -317
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
319
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -318
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
320
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -319
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
321
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -320
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
322
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -321
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
323
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -322
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
324
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -323
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
325
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -324
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
326
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -325
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
327
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -326
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
328
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -327
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
329
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -328
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
330
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -329
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
331
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -330
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
332
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -331
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
333
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -332
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
334
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -333
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
335
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -334
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
336
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -335
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
337
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -336
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0, 170 mm
338
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -337
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0, 170 mm
339
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -338
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 230 mm
340
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -339
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 230 mm
341
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -340
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 230 mm
342
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -341
ISO 2000, 1/250 sec at f / 5.6, 230 mm
343
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -342
ISO 2000, 1/320 sec at f / 5.6, 230 mm
344
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -343
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
345
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -344
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
346
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -345
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
347
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -346
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
348
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -347
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
349
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -348
ISO 2000, 1/320 sec at f / 5.6, 250 mm
350
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -349
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.0, 180 mm
351
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -350
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0, 180 mm
352
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -351
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
353
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -352
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
354
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -353
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
355
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -354
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
356
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -355
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
357
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -356
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
358
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -357
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
359
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -358
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
360
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -359
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm