Back David Rembecki
Pages:<1 2 34 5 >
181
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -180
ISO 1000, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 170 mm
182
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -181
183
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -182
ISO 1000, 1/4000 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
184
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -183
ISO 1000, 1/3200 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
185
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -184
ISO 1000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
186
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -185
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
187
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -186
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 320 mm
188
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -187
189
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -188
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
190
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -189
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
191
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -190
ISO 1000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
192
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -191
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
193
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -192
ISO 1000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
194
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -193
ISO 1000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
195
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -194
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.0, 180 mm
196
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -195
ISO 1000, 1/250 sec at f / 5.6, 250 mm
197
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -196
ISO 1000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
198
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -197
199
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -198
ISO 1000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
200
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -199
201
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -200
202
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -201
203
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -202
ISO 1000, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
204
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -203
205
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -204
ISO 1000, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
206
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -205
207
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -206
ISO 1000, 1/400 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
208
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -207
ISO 1000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 170 mm
209
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -208
ISO 1000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 180 mm
210
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -209
211
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -210
212
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -211
ISO 1000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
213
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -212
ISO 1000, 1/80 sec at f / 18, 400 mm
214
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -213
ISO 1000, 1/80 sec at f / 14, 210 mm
215
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -214
ISO 1000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
216
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -215
ISO 1000, 1/1000 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
217
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -216
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
218
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -217
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
219
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -218
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 400 mm
220
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -219
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 11, 120 mm
221
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -220
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 10, 320 mm
222
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -221
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 9.0, 250 mm
223
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -222
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 8.0, 250 mm
224
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -223
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 5.6, 250 mm
225
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -224
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
226
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -225
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 140 mm
227
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -226
228
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -227
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0, 140 mm
229
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -228
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
230
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -229
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
231
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -230
232
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -231
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
233
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -232
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 180 mm
234
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -233
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.0, 180 mm
235
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -234
236
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -235
237
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -236
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 10, 230 mm
238
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -237
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0, 180 mm
239
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -238
240
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -239
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5, 130 mm
241
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -240
242
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -241
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
243
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -242
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
244
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -243
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
245
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -244
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
246
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -245
247
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -246
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
248
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -247
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
249
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -248
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
250
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -249
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
251
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -250
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
252
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -251
253
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -252
254
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -253
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0, 170 mm
255
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -254
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 170 mm
256
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -255
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 170 mm
257
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -256
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0, 170 mm
258
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -257
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 5.0, 170 mm
259
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -258
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
260
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -259
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
261
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -260
262
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -261
263
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -262
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 5.0, 180 mm
264
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -263
265
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -264
ISO 2000, 1/320 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
266
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -265
267
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -266
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
268
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -267
269
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -268
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 8.0, 200 mm
270
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae -269
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm