2011 FVAA Flash Red TFC Frendlies vs NASA 11 Select

Back | David Rembecki

2011 FVAA Flash Red

TFC Frendlies vs NASA 11 Select

<1 2 3 4

301

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -301

302

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -302

303

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     110 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -303

304

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -304

305

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -305

306

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -306

307

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -307

308

1/3200 sec at f / 3.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -308

309

1/3200 sec at f / 3.2     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -309

310

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -310

311

1/2500 sec at f / 2.8     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -311

312

1/3200 sec at f / 3.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -312

313

1/3200 sec at f / 3.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -313

314

1/3200 sec at f / 3.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -314

315

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     105 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -315

316

1/3200 sec at f / 4.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -316

317

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -317

318

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -318

319

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -319

320

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     105 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -320

321

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -321

322

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -322

323

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -323

324

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -324

325

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -325

326

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -326

327

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -327

328

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     110 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -328

329

1/3200 sec at f / 4.5     110 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -329

330

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -330

331

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -331

332

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -332

333

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     110 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -333

334

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     110 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -334

335

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     110 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -335

336

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     83 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -336

337

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     83 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -337

338

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -338

339

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     105 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -339

340

1/3200 sec at f / 10     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -340

341

1/3200 sec at f / 4.5     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -341

342

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     110 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -342

343

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -343

344

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     145 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -344

345

1/3200 sec at f / 4.5     145 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -345

346

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -346

347

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -347

348

1/3200 sec at f / 3.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -348

349

1/3200 sec at f / 3.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -349

350

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -350

351

1/3200 sec at f / 3.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -351

352

1/3200 sec at f / 4.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -352

353

1/2500 sec at f / 2.8     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -353

354

1/3200 sec at f / 3.2     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -354

355

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -355

356

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     135 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -356

357

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     135 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -357

358

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -358

359

1/3200 sec at f / 9.0     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -359

360

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     105 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -360

361

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     105 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -361

362

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     105 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -362

363

1/3200 sec at f / 10     110 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -363

364

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     118 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -364

365

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -365

366

1/3200 sec at f / 3.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -366

367

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -367

368

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -368

369

1/3200 sec at f / 3.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -369

370

1/3200 sec at f / 3.2     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -370

371

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -371

372

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -372

<1 2 3 4

Powered by The Turning Gate (TTG).

Back | David Rembecki

2011 All rights reserved.
Powered by The Turning Gate (TTG).