2011 FVAA Flash Red TFC Frendlies vs NASA 11 Select

Back | David Rembecki

2011 FVAA Flash Red

TFC Frendlies vs NASA 11 Select

<1 2 3 4 >

101

1/1250 sec at f / 2.8     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -101

102

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -102

103

1/3200 sec at f / 3.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -103

104

1/3200 sec at f / 3.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -104

105

1/3200 sec at f / 3.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -105

106

1/3200 sec at f / 3.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -106

107

1/2000 sec at f / 2.8     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -107

108

1/3200 sec at f / 2.8     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -108

109

1/3200 sec at f / 3.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -109

110

1/2000 sec at f / 2.8     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -110

111

1/2000 sec at f / 2.8     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -111

112

1/3200 sec at f / 3.2     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -112

113

1/3200 sec at f / 3.2     155 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -113

114

1/3200 sec at f / 3.5     155 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -114

115

1/2500 sec at f / 2.8     155 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -115

116

1/3200 sec at f / 3.2     155 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -116

117

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -117

118

1/3200 sec at f / 3.2     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -118

119

1/3200 sec at f / 2.8     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -119

120

1/3200 sec at f / 3.2     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -120

121

1/3200 sec at f / 4.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -121

122

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -122

123

1/3200 sec at f / 3.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -123

124

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     135 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -124

125

1/2500 sec at f / 2.8     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -125

126

1/2500 sec at f / 2.8     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -126

127

1/2500 sec at f / 2.8     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -127

128

1/2500 sec at f / 2.8     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -128

129

1/3200 sec at f / 3.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -129

130

1/3200 sec at f / 3.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -130

131

1/3200 sec at f / 4.5     88 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -131

132

1/3200 sec at f / 3.5     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -132

133

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -133

134

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -134

135

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -135

136

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -136

137

1/640 sec at f / 2.8     110 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -137

138

1/2000 sec at f / 2.8     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -138

139

1/2000 sec at f / 2.8     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -139

140

1/2000 sec at f / 2.8     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -140

141

1/2000 sec at f / 2.8     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -141

142

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -142

143

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -143

144

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -144

145

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -145

146

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -146

147

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -147

148

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -148

149

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     128 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -149

150

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     128 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -150

151

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     118 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -151

152

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     180 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -152

153

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     180 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -153

154

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     180 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -154

155

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     180 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -155

156

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     180 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -156

157

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     180 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -157

158

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     180 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -158

159

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     128 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -159

160

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     155 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -160

161

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     145 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -161

162

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     110 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -162

163

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     78 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -163

164

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     78 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -164

165

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     78 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -165

166

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     78 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -166

167

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -167

168

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -168

169

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -169

170

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -170

171

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     155 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -171

172

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     155 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -172

173

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     155 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -173

174

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     155 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -174

175

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -175

176

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -176

177

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -177

178

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -178

179

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -179

180

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -180

181

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -181

182

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -182

183

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -183

184

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -184

185

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -185

186

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -186

187

1/3200 sec at f / 4.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -187

188

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -188

189

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -189

190

1/3200 sec at f / 9.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -190

191

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -191

192

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -192

193

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     105 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -193

194

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     88 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -194

195

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     78 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -195

196

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     135 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -196

197

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -197

198

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -198

199

1/3200 sec at f / 4.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -199

200

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -200

<1 2 3 4 >

Powered by The Turning Gate (TTG).

Back | David Rembecki

2011 All rights reserved.
Powered by The Turning Gate (TTG).