2011 FVAA Flash Red TFC Frendlies vs NASA 11 Select

Back | David Rembecki

2011 FVAA Flash Red

TFC Frendlies vs NASA 11 Select

<1 2 3 4 >

201

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -201

202

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -202

203

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     118 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -203

204

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     118 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -204

205

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -205

206

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -206

207

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -207

208

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -208

209

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -209

210

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -210

211

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -211

212

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -212

213

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     98 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -213

214

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     78 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -214

215

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     78 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -215

216

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -216

217

1/3200 sec at f / 9.0     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -217

218

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -218

219

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -219

220

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -220

221

1/3200 sec at f / 4.5     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -221

222

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -222

223

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -223

224

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     118 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -224

225

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     118 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -225

226

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     118 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -226

227

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -227

228

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -228

229

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     135 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -229

230

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     135 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -230

231

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -231

232

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -232

233

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -233

234

1/3200 sec at f / 9.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -234

235

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     145 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -235

236

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     145 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -236

237

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     145 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -237

238

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -238

239

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -239

240

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -240

241

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -241

242

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -242

243

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     98 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -243

244

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -244

245

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -245

246

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -246

247

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -247

248

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -248

249

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -249

250

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -250

251

1/3200 sec at f / 9.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -251

252

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     118 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -252

253

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     135 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -253

254

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     135 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -254

255

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     135 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -255

256

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     155 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -256

257

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -257

258

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -258

259

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     118 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -259

260

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -260

261

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     88 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -261

262

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     88 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -262

263

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -263

264

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -264

265

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -265

266

1/3200 sec at f / 4.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -266

267

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -267

268

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -268

269

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -269

270

1/3200 sec at f / 4.5     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -270

271

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -271

272

1/3200 sec at f / 8.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -272

273

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -273

274

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -274

275

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -275

276

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -276

277

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -277

278

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -278

279

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -279

280

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -280

281

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     145 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -281

282

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     145 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -282

283

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     105 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -283

284

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     155 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -284

285

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     118 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -285

286

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     118 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -286

287

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -287

288

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -288

289

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -289

290

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -290

291

1/3200 sec at f / 7.1     70 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -291

292

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     110 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -292

293

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     110 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -293

294

1/3200 sec at f / 4.0     110 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -294

295

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -295

296

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -296

297

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -297

298

1/3200 sec at f / 5.0     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -298

299

1/3200 sec at f / 6.3     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -299

300

1/3200 sec at f / 5.6     200 mm

TFC F G3 vs NASA 11 Select -300

<1 2 3 4 >

Powered by The Turning Gate (TTG).

Back | David Rembecki

2011 All rights reserved.
Powered by The Turning Gate (TTG).