Site Title
2013 Barton Womens Soccer
G16 vs King University
181
Barton Women vs King University - 181
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 6.3, 140 mm
182
Barton Women vs King University - 182
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
183
Barton Women vs King University - 183
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
184
Barton Women vs King University - 184
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
185
Barton Women vs King University - 185
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
186
Barton Women vs King University - 186
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
187
Barton Women vs King University - 187
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
188
Barton Women vs King University - 188
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
189
Barton Women vs King University - 189
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
190
Barton Women vs King University - 190
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 6.3, 370 mm
191
Barton Women vs King University - 191
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
192
Barton Women vs King University - 192
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
193
Barton Women vs King University - 193
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
194
Barton Women vs King University - 194
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
195
Barton Women vs King University - 195
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
196
Barton Women vs King University - 196
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
197
Barton Women vs King University - 197
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
198
Barton Women vs King University - 198
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
199
Barton Women vs King University - 199
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
200
Barton Women vs King University - 200
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
201
Barton Women vs King University - 201
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
202
Barton Women vs King University - 202
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
203
Barton Women vs King University - 203
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
204
Barton Women vs King University - 204
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
205
Barton Women vs King University - 205
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
206
Barton Women vs King University - 206
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
207
Barton Women vs King University - 207
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.5, 75 mm
208
Barton Women vs King University - 208
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
209
Barton Women vs King University - 209
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
210
Barton Women vs King University - 210
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
211
Barton Women vs King University - 211
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
212
Barton Women vs King University - 212
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
213
Barton Women vs King University - 213
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
214
Barton Women vs King University - 214
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 6.3, 370 mm
215
Barton Women vs King University - 215
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 6.3, 370 mm
216
Barton Women vs King University - 216
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 6.3, 370 mm
217
Barton Women vs King University - 217
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 6.3, 370 mm
218
Barton Women vs King University - 218
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
219
Barton Women vs King University - 219
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
220
Barton Women vs King University - 220
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
221
Barton Women vs King University - 221
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
222
Barton Women vs King University - 222
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
223
Barton Women vs King University - 223
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
224
Barton Women vs King University - 224
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
225
Barton Women vs King University - 225
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
226
Barton Women vs King University - 226
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
227
Barton Women vs King University - 227
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
228
Barton Women vs King University - 228
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
229
Barton Women vs King University - 229
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
230
Barton Women vs King University - 230
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
231
Barton Women vs King University - 231
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
232
Barton Women vs King University - 232
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 6.3, 240 mm
233
Barton Women vs King University - 233
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
234
Barton Women vs King University - 234
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
235
Barton Women vs King University - 235
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 6.3, 240 mm
236
Barton Women vs King University - 236
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
237
Barton Women vs King University - 237
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
238
Barton Women vs King University - 238
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
239
Barton Women vs King University - 239
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
240
Barton Women vs King University - 240
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
241
Barton Women vs King University - 241
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
242
Barton Women vs King University - 242
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
243
Barton Women vs King University - 243
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
244
Barton Women vs King University - 244
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
245
Barton Women vs King University - 245
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
246
Barton Women vs King University - 246
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
247
Barton Women vs King University - 247
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
248
Barton Women vs King University - 248
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 450 mm
249
Barton Women vs King University - 249
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 6.3, 140 mm
250
Barton Women vs King University - 250
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
251
Barton Women vs King University - 251
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
252
Barton Women vs King University - 252
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
253
Barton Women vs King University - 253
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
254
Barton Women vs King University - 254
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
255
Barton Women vs King University - 255
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
256
Barton Women vs King University - 256
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
257
Barton Women vs King University - 257
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
258
Barton Women vs King University - 258
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
259
Barton Women vs King University - 259
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
260
Barton Women vs King University - 260
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 370 mm
261
Barton Women vs King University - 261
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 370 mm
262
Barton Women vs King University - 262
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 6.3, 370 mm
263
Barton Women vs King University - 263
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 370 mm
264
Barton Women vs King University - 264
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 7.1, 290 mm
265
Barton Women vs King University - 265
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
266
Barton Women vs King University - 266
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
267
Barton Women vs King University - 267
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
268
Barton Women vs King University - 268
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
269
Barton Women vs King University - 269
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
270
Barton Women vs King University - 270
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm