Site Title
2013 Barton Womens Soccer
G16 vs King University
91
Barton Women vs King University - 091
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
92
Barton Women vs King University - 092
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
93
Barton Women vs King University - 093
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
94
Barton Women vs King University - 094
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
95
Barton Women vs King University - 095
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
96
Barton Women vs King University - 096
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
97
Barton Women vs King University - 097
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
98
Barton Women vs King University - 098
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
99
Barton Women vs King University - 099
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
100
Barton Women vs King University - 100
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
101
Barton Women vs King University - 101
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
102
Barton Women vs King University - 102
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
103
Barton Women vs King University - 103
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 370 mm
104
Barton Women vs King University - 104
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
105
Barton Women vs King University - 105
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 450 mm
106
Barton Women vs King University - 106
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 450 mm
107
Barton Women vs King University - 107
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 450 mm
108
Barton Women vs King University - 108
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 450 mm
109
Barton Women vs King University - 109
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
110
Barton Women vs King University - 110
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
111
Barton Women vs King University - 111
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
112
Barton Women vs King University - 112
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
113
Barton Women vs King University - 113
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
114
Barton Women vs King University - 114
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 6.3, 93 mm
115
Barton Women vs King University - 115
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 7.1, 370 mm
116
Barton Women vs King University - 116
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
117
Barton Women vs King University - 117
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
118
Barton Women vs King University - 118
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
119
Barton Women vs King University - 119
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
120
Barton Women vs King University - 120
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
121
Barton Women vs King University - 121
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
122
Barton Women vs King University - 122
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
123
Barton Women vs King University - 123
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
124
Barton Women vs King University - 124
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
125
Barton Women vs King University - 125
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
126
Barton Women vs King University - 126
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
127
Barton Women vs King University - 127
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
128
Barton Women vs King University - 128
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
129
Barton Women vs King University - 129
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
130
Barton Women vs King University - 130
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
131
Barton Women vs King University - 131
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
132
Barton Women vs King University - 132
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
133
Barton Women vs King University - 133
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
134
Barton Women vs King University - 134
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
135
Barton Women vs King University - 135
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
136
Barton Women vs King University - 136
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
137
Barton Women vs King University - 137
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
138
Barton Women vs King University - 138
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
139
Barton Women vs King University - 139
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
140
Barton Women vs King University - 140
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
141
Barton Women vs King University - 141
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
142
Barton Women vs King University - 142
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
143
Barton Women vs King University - 143
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
144
Barton Women vs King University - 144
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
145
Barton Women vs King University - 145
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
146
Barton Women vs King University - 146
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
147
Barton Women vs King University - 147
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
148
Barton Women vs King University - 148
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
149
Barton Women vs King University - 149
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
150
Barton Women vs King University - 150
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
151
Barton Women vs King University - 151
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
152
Barton Women vs King University - 152
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
153
Barton Women vs King University - 153
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
154
Barton Women vs King University - 154
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
155
Barton Women vs King University - 155
ISO 800, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
156
Barton Women vs King University - 156
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
157
Barton Women vs King University - 157
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 6.3, 370 mm
158
Barton Women vs King University - 158
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
159
Barton Women vs King University - 159
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
160
Barton Women vs King University - 160
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
161
Barton Women vs King University - 161
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
162
Barton Women vs King University - 162
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
163
Barton Women vs King University - 163
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
164
Barton Women vs King University - 164
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
165
Barton Women vs King University - 165
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
166
Barton Women vs King University - 166
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
167
Barton Women vs King University - 167
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
168
Barton Women vs King University - 168
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
169
Barton Women vs King University - 169
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
170
Barton Women vs King University - 170
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
171
Barton Women vs King University - 171
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
172
Barton Women vs King University - 172
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
173
Barton Women vs King University - 173
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
174
Barton Women vs King University - 174
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
175
Barton Women vs King University - 175
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
176
Barton Women vs King University - 176
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
177
Barton Women vs King University - 177
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
178
Barton Women vs King University - 178
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
179
Barton Women vs King University - 179
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
180
Barton Women vs King University - 180
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 6.3, 140 mm