Site Title
2013 Barton Womens Soccer
G16 vs King University
901
Barton Women vs King University - 901
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
902
Barton Women vs King University - 902
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
903
Barton Women vs King University - 903
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
904
Barton Women vs King University - 904
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
905
Barton Women vs King University - 905
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
906
Barton Women vs King University - 906
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
907
Barton Women vs King University - 907
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
908
Barton Women vs King University - 908
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
909
Barton Women vs King University - 909
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
910
Barton Women vs King University - 910
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
911
Barton Women vs King University - 911
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 4.5, 75 mm
912
Barton Women vs King University - 912
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 4.5, 75 mm
913
Barton Women vs King University - 913
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.5, 65 mm
914
Barton Women vs King University - 914
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
915
Barton Women vs King University - 915
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 7.1, 58 mm
916
Barton Women vs King University - 916
ISO 800, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
917
Barton Women vs King University - 917
ISO 800, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
918
Barton Women vs King University - 918
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 7.1, 370 mm
919
Barton Women vs King University - 919
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 7.1, 370 mm
920
Barton Women vs King University - 920
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
921
Barton Women vs King University - 921
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
922
Barton Women vs King University - 922
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
923
Barton Women vs King University - 923
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
924
Barton Women vs King University - 924
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
925
Barton Women vs King University - 925
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
926
Barton Women vs King University - 926
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
927
Barton Women vs King University - 927
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
928
Barton Women vs King University - 928
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
929
Barton Women vs King University - 929
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
930
Barton Women vs King University - 930
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
931
Barton Women vs King University - 931
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
932
Barton Women vs King University - 932
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
933
Barton Women vs King University - 933
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
934
Barton Women vs King University - 934
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
935
Barton Women vs King University - 935
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
936
Barton Women vs King University - 936
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
937
Barton Women vs King University - 937
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
938
Barton Women vs King University - 938
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
939
Barton Women vs King University - 939
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 410 mm
940
Barton Women vs King University - 940
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 410 mm
941
Barton Women vs King University - 941
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
942
Barton Women vs King University - 942
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
943
Barton Women vs King University - 943
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
944
Barton Women vs King University - 944
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
945
Barton Women vs King University - 945
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
946
Barton Women vs King University - 946
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
947
Barton Women vs King University - 947
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
948
Barton Women vs King University - 948
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
949
Barton Women vs King University - 949
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
950
Barton Women vs King University - 950
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
951
Barton Women vs King University - 951
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
952
Barton Women vs King University - 952
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
953
Barton Women vs King University - 953
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
954
Barton Women vs King University - 954
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
955
Barton Women vs King University - 955
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
956
Barton Women vs King University - 956
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 6.3, 450 mm
957
Barton Women vs King University - 957
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 6.3, 450 mm
958
Barton Women vs King University - 958
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 6.3, 450 mm
959
Barton Women vs King University - 959
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 6.3, 450 mm
960
Barton Women vs King University - 960
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 6.3, 450 mm
961
Barton Women vs King University - 961
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 6.3, 450 mm
962
Barton Women vs King University - 962
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
963
Barton Women vs King University - 963
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
964
Barton Women vs King University - 964
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
965
Barton Women vs King University - 965
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
966
Barton Women vs King University - 966
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
967
Barton Women vs King University - 967
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
968
Barton Women vs King University - 968
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
969
Barton Women vs King University - 969
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
970
Barton Women vs King University - 970
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
971
Barton Women vs King University - 971
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
972
Barton Women vs King University - 972
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
973
Barton Women vs King University - 973
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
974
Barton Women vs King University - 974
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
975
Barton Women vs King University - 975
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
976
Barton Women vs King University - 976
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
977
Barton Women vs King University - 977
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
978
Barton Women vs King University - 978
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
979
Barton Women vs King University - 979
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
980
Barton Women vs King University - 980
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
981
Barton Women vs King University - 981
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
982
Barton Women vs King University - 982
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
983
Barton Women vs King University - 983
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 500 mm
984
Barton Women vs King University - 984
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 500 mm
985
Barton Women vs King University - 985
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 450 mm
986
Barton Women vs King University - 986
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 450 mm
987
Barton Women vs King University - 987
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 450 mm
988
Barton Women vs King University - 988
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 450 mm
989
Barton Women vs King University - 989
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
990
Barton Women vs King University - 990
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm