Site Title
2013 Barton Womens Soccer
G16 vs King University
811
Barton Women vs King University - 811
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
812
Barton Women vs King University - 812
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
813
Barton Women vs King University - 813
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
814
Barton Women vs King University - 814
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
815
Barton Women vs King University - 815
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
816
Barton Women vs King University - 816
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
817
Barton Women vs King University - 817
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
818
Barton Women vs King University - 818
ISO 800, 1/400 sec at f / 4.5, 75 mm
819
Barton Women vs King University - 819
ISO 800, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
820
Barton Women vs King University - 820
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 500 mm
821
Barton Women vs King University - 821
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 370 mm
822
Barton Women vs King University - 822
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 370 mm
823
Barton Women vs King University - 823
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 370 mm
824
Barton Women vs King University - 824
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
825
Barton Women vs King University - 825
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
826
Barton Women vs King University - 826
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
827
Barton Women vs King University - 827
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
828
Barton Women vs King University - 828
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
829
Barton Women vs King University - 829
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
830
Barton Women vs King University - 830
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
831
Barton Women vs King University - 831
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
832
Barton Women vs King University - 832
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
833
Barton Women vs King University - 833
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 7.1, 240 mm
834
Barton Women vs King University - 834
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
835
Barton Women vs King University - 835
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
836
Barton Women vs King University - 836
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
837
Barton Women vs King University - 837
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
838
Barton Women vs King University - 838
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
839
Barton Women vs King University - 839
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
840
Barton Women vs King University - 840
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
841
Barton Women vs King University - 841
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
842
Barton Women vs King University - 842
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
843
Barton Women vs King University - 843
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
844
Barton Women vs King University - 844
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
845
Barton Women vs King University - 845
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
846
Barton Women vs King University - 846
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
847
Barton Women vs King University - 847
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
848
Barton Women vs King University - 848
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
849
Barton Women vs King University - 849
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
850
Barton Women vs King University - 850
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
851
Barton Women vs King University - 851
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
852
Barton Women vs King University - 852
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 370 mm
853
Barton Women vs King University - 853
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
854
Barton Women vs King University - 854
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
855
Barton Women vs King University - 855
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
856
Barton Women vs King University - 856
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
857
Barton Women vs King University - 857
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
858
Barton Women vs King University - 858
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
859
Barton Women vs King University - 859
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
860
Barton Women vs King University - 860
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
861
Barton Women vs King University - 861
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
862
Barton Women vs King University - 862
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
863
Barton Women vs King University - 863
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
864
Barton Women vs King University - 864
ISO 800, 1/1250 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
865
Barton Women vs King University - 865
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 6.3, 410 mm
866
Barton Women vs King University - 866
ISO 800, 1/640 sec at f / 6.3, 410 mm
867
Barton Women vs King University - 867
ISO 800, 1/640 sec at f / 6.3, 410 mm
868
Barton Women vs King University - 868
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
869
Barton Women vs King University - 869
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 6.3, 410 mm
870
Barton Women vs King University - 870
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 6.3, 410 mm
871
Barton Women vs King University - 871
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 6.3, 410 mm
872
Barton Women vs King University - 872
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 6.3, 410 mm
873
Barton Women vs King University - 873
ISO 800, 1/800 sec at f / 6.3, 410 mm
874
Barton Women vs King University - 874
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 410 mm
875
Barton Women vs King University - 875
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 410 mm
876
Barton Women vs King University - 876
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3, 410 mm
877
Barton Women vs King University - 877
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 410 mm
878
Barton Women vs King University - 878
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 6.3, 370 mm
879
Barton Women vs King University - 879
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 370 mm
880
Barton Women vs King University - 880
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 6.3, 370 mm
881
Barton Women vs King University - 881
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
882
Barton Women vs King University - 882
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
883
Barton Women vs King University - 883
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
884
Barton Women vs King University - 884
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
885
Barton Women vs King University - 885
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
886
Barton Women vs King University - 886
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
887
Barton Women vs King University - 887
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
888
Barton Women vs King University - 888
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
889
Barton Women vs King University - 889
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
890
Barton Women vs King University - 890
ISO 800, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
891
Barton Women vs King University - 891
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
892
Barton Women vs King University - 892
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
893
Barton Women vs King University - 893
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
894
Barton Women vs King University - 894
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 5.6, 65 mm
895
Barton Women vs King University - 895
ISO 800, 1/2500 sec at f / 5.6, 65 mm
896
Barton Women vs King University - 896
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.5, 65 mm
897
Barton Women vs King University - 897
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.5, 65 mm
898
Barton Women vs King University - 898
ISO 800, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.5, 65 mm
899
Barton Women vs King University - 899
ISO 800, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5, 75 mm
900
Barton Women vs King University - 900
ISO 800, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm