Site Title
2012 Barton Bulldog Womens Soccer
Barton vs North Greenville, September, 22
271
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -271
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 180 mm
272
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -272
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 180 mm
273
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -273
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 180 mm
274
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -274
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
275
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -275
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
276
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -276
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
277
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -277
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
278
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -278
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
279
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -279
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
280
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -280
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
281
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -281
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
282
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -282
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
283
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -283
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
284
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -284
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
285
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -285
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
286
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -286
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
287
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -287
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
288
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -288
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
289
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -289
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
290
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -290
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
291
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -291
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
292
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -292
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
293
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -293
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
294
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -294
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
295
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -295
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
296
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -296
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
297
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -297
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
298
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -298
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
299
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -299
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
300
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -300
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
301
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -301
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
302
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -302
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
303
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -303
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
304
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -304
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
305
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -305
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
306
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -306
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
307
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -307
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
308
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -308
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
309
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -309
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
310
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -310
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
311
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -311
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
312
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -312
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
313
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -313
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
314
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -314
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
315
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -315
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
316
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -316
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
317
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -317
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
318
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -318
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
319
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -319
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
320
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -320
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
321
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -321
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
322
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -322
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
323
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -323
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
324
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -324
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
325
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -325
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
326
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -326
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
327
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -327
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
328
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -328
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
329
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -329
ISO 8000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
330
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -330
ISO 8000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
331
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -331
ISO 8000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 180 mm
332
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -332
ISO 8000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 180 mm
333
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -333
ISO 8000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
334
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -334
ISO 8000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
335
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -335
ISO 8000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 105 mm
336
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -336
ISO 8000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
337
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -337
ISO 8000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
338
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -338
ISO 8000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
339
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -339
ISO 8000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 98 mm
340
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -340
ISO 8000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
341
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -341
ISO 8000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
342
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -342
ISO 8000, 1/3200 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
343
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -343
ISO 8000, 1/3200 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
344
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -344
ISO 8000, 1/3200 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
345
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -345
ISO 8000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
346
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -346
ISO 8000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
347
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -347
ISO 8000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
348
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -348
ISO 8000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
349
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -349
ISO 8000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
350
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -350
ISO 8000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
351
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -351
ISO 8000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm