Site Title
2012 Barton Bulldog Womens Soccer
Barton vs North Greenville, September, 22
181
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -181
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
182
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -182
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
183
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -183
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
184
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -184
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
185
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -185
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
186
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -186
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
187
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -187
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
188
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -188
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
189
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -189
ISO 2000, 1/4000 sec at f / 3.2, 200 mm
190
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -190
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
191
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -191
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
192
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -192
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
193
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -193
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
194
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -194
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
195
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -195
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
196
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -196
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
197
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -197
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
198
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -198
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
199
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -199
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
200
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -200
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
201
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -201
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
202
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -202
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
203
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -203
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
204
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -204
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
205
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -205
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
206
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -206
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
207
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -207
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
208
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -208
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
209
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -209
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
210
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -210
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
211
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -211
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
212
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -212
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
213
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -213
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
214
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -214
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
215
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -215
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
216
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -216
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
217
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -217
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 180 mm
218
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -218
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 180 mm
219
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -219
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 180 mm
220
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -220
ISO 2000, 1/3200 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
221
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -221
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
222
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -222
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
223
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -223
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
224
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -224
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
225
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -225
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
226
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -226
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
227
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -227
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
228
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -228
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
229
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -229
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
230
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -230
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
231
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -231
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
232
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -232
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
233
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -233
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
234
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -234
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
235
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -235
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
236
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -236
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
237
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -237
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
238
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -238
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
239
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -239
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
240
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -240
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
241
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -241
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
242
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -242
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
243
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -243
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
244
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -244
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
245
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -245
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
246
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -246
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
247
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -247
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
248
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -248
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
249
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -249
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
250
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -250
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
251
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -251
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
252
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -252
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
253
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -253
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
254
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -254
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 180 mm
255
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -255
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 180 mm
256
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -256
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
257
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -257
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
258
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -258
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
259
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -259
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
260
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -260
ISO 2000, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
261
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -261
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
262
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -262
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
263
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -263
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
264
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -264
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
265
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -265
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
266
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -266
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
267
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -267
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
268
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -268
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
269
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -269
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 180 mm
270
G9 Barton vs North Greenville (H) -270
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm