Back David Rembecki
Pages:<1 2 34 5 6 >
251
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 251
ISO 4000, 1/160 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
Google Maps
35°44'38" N 77°54'57" W
252
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 252
253
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 253
254
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 254
ISO 4000, 1/125 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
255
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 255
ISO 4000, 1/200 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
256
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 256
ISO 4000, 1/125 sec at f / 5.6, 320 mm
257
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 257
ISO 4000, 1/125 sec at f / 5.6, 230 mm
258
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 258
ISO 4000, 1/320 sec at f / 9.0, 158 mm
259
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 259
260
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 260
ISO 8000, 1/100 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
35°44'37" N 77°54'57" W
261
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 261
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 5.6, 158 mm
35°44'36" N 77°54'57" W
262
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 262
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 8.0, 158 mm
263
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 263
ISO 8000, 1/200 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
264
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 264
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 6.3, 270 mm
265
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 265
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 10, 180 mm
266
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 266
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 6.3, 180 mm
267
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 267
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 11, 180 mm
268
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 268
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 9.0, 180 mm
269
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 269
ISO 8000, 1/200 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
270
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 270
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 14, 158 mm
271
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 271
ISO 8000, 1/250 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
272
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 272
273
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 273
274
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 274
275
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 275
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 10, 200 mm
276
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 276
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 9.0, 200 mm
277
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 277
278
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 278
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 11, 140 mm
279
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 279
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 8.0, 120 mm
280
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 280
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 13, 120 mm
281
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 281
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 5.6, 120 mm
282
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 282
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 11, 120 mm
283
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 283
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 7.1, 120 mm
284
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 284
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 9.0, 170 mm
285
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 285
286
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 286
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 11, 158 mm
287
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 287
288
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 288
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 13, 158 mm
289
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 289
290
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 290
ISO 8000, 1/250 sec at f / 5.6, 400 mm
291
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 291
292
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 292
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 5.6, 230 mm
293
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 293
294
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 294
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 6.3, 250 mm
295
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 295
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 9.0, 210 mm
296
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 296
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 6.3, 210 mm
297
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 297
ISO 8000, 1/160 sec at f / 5.0, 180 mm
298
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 298
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 7.1, 180 mm
35°44'35" N 77°54'54" W
299
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 299
ISO 8000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
35°44'35" N 77°54'53" W
300
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 300
301
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 301
ISO 8000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
302
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 302
ISO 8000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
303
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 303
ISO 8000, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
304
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 304
ISO 8000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
305
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 305
306
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 306
307
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 307
ISO 8000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
308
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 308
ISO 8000, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.2, 200 mm
309
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 309
ISO 8000, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.5, 200 mm
310
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 310
ISO 8000, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.0, 200 mm
311
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 311
ISO 8000, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.5, 200 mm
312
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 312
ISO 8000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
313
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 313
ISO 8000, 1/1600 sec at f / 7.1, 170 mm
314
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 314
ISO 8000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 98 mm
315
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 315
ISO 8000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
316
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 316
317
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 317
318
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 318
ISO 8000, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
319
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 319
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
320
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 320
321
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 321
322
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 322
323
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 323
324
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 324
325
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 325
326
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 326
327
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 327
ISO 8000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
328
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 328
35°44'36" N 77°54'53" W
329
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 329
ISO 8000, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
330
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 330
331
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 331
332
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 332
333
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 333
334
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 334
335
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 335
336
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 336
337
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 337
338
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 338
339
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 339
340
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 340
341
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 341
342
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 342
343
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 343
344
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 344
345
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 345
ISO 8000, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
346
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 346
ISO 8000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
347
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 347
348
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 348
349
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 349
350
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 350
ISO 8000, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.5, 155 mm
351
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 351
ISO 8000, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.2, 155 mm
352
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 352
353
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 353
ISO 8000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
354
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 354
ISO 8000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
355
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 355
356
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 356
ISO 8000, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.5, 170 mm
357
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 357
ISO 8000, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
358
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 358
359
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 359
ISO 8000, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
360
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 360
ISO 8000, 1/320 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
361
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 361
ISO 8000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 98 mm
362
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 362
ISO 8000, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 88 mm
363
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 363
ISO 8000, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.5, 88 mm
35°44'36" N 77°54'52" W
364
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 364
365
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 365
ISO 8000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 88 mm
366
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 366
367
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 367
368
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 368
369
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 369
370
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 370
ISO 8000, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.0, 145 mm
371
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 371
372
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 372
ISO 8000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
373
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 373
374
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 374
375
Barton Men vs Lees-McRae - 375