Site Title
2013 Barton Womens Soccer
G18 vs Converse College
91
Barton Women vs Converse College - 091
ISO 32000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
92
Barton Women vs Converse College - 092
ISO 32000, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
93
Barton Women vs Converse College - 093
ISO 32000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
94
Barton Women vs Converse College - 094
ISO 32000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
95
Barton Women vs Converse College - 095
ISO 32000, 1/2500 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
96
Barton Women vs Converse College - 096
ISO 32000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
97
Barton Women vs Converse College - 097
ISO 32000, 1/400 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
98
Barton Women vs Converse College - 098
ISO 32000, 1/320 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
99
Barton Women vs Converse College - 099
ISO 32000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
100
Barton Women vs Converse College - 100
ISO 32000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
101
Barton Women vs Converse College - 101
ISO 32000, 1/160 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
102
Barton Women vs Converse College - 102
ISO 32000, 1/200 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
103
Barton Women vs Converse College - 103
ISO 32000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
104
Barton Women vs Converse College - 104
ISO 32000, 1/1000 sec at f / 4.5, 75 mm
105
Barton Women vs Converse College - 105
ISO 32000, 1/1000 sec at f / 4.5, 75 mm
106
Barton Women vs Converse College - 106
ISO 32000, 1/1250 sec at f / 4.5, 75 mm
107
Barton Women vs Converse College - 107
ISO 32000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
108
Barton Women vs Converse College - 108
ISO 32000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
109
Barton Women vs Converse College - 109
ISO 32000, 1/320 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
110
Barton Women vs Converse College - 110
ISO 32000, 1/250 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
111
Barton Women vs Converse College - 111
ISO 32000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
112
Barton Women vs Converse College - 112
ISO 32000, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
113
Barton Women vs Converse College - 113
ISO 32000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
114
Barton Women vs Converse College - 114
ISO 32000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
115
Barton Women vs Converse College - 115
ISO 32000, 1/250 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
116
Barton Women vs Converse College - 116
ISO 32000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
117
Barton Women vs Converse College - 117
ISO 32000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
118
Barton Women vs Converse College - 118
ISO 32000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
119
Barton Women vs Converse College - 119
ISO 32000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
120
Barton Women vs Converse College - 120
ISO 32000, 1/3200 sec at f / 6.3, 113 mm
121
Barton Women vs Converse College - 121
ISO 32000, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.5, 65 mm
122
Barton Women vs Converse College - 122
ISO 32000, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.5, 65 mm
123
Barton Women vs Converse College - 123
ISO 32000, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.5, 65 mm
124
Barton Women vs Converse College - 124
ISO 32000, 1/1250 sec at f / 4.5, 75 mm
125
Barton Women vs Converse College - 125
ISO 32000, 1/2500 sec at f / 4.5, 75 mm
126
Barton Women vs Converse College - 126
ISO 32000, 1/3200 sec at f / 7.1, 75 mm
127
Barton Women vs Converse College - 127
ISO 32000, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.5, 65 mm
128
Barton Women vs Converse College - 128
ISO 32000, 1/1000 sec at f / 4.5, 65 mm
129
Barton Women vs Converse College - 129
ISO 32000, 1/500 sec at f / 4.5, 65 mm
130
Barton Women vs Converse College - 130
ISO 32000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
131
Barton Women vs Converse College - 131
ISO 32000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
132
Barton Women vs Converse College - 132
ISO 32000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
133
Barton Women vs Converse College - 133
ISO 32000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
134
Barton Women vs Converse College - 134
ISO 32000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
135
Barton Women vs Converse College - 135
ISO 32000, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
136
Barton Women vs Converse College - 136
ISO 32000, 1/2500 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
137
Barton Women vs Converse College - 137
ISO 32000, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
138
Barton Women vs Converse College - 138
ISO 32000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
139
Barton Women vs Converse College - 139
ISO 32000, 1/2500 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
140
Barton Women vs Converse College - 140
ISO 32000, 1/2500 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
141
Barton Women vs Converse College - 141
ISO 32000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
142
Barton Women vs Converse College - 142
ISO 32000, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
143
Barton Women vs Converse College - 143
ISO 32000, 1/800 sec at f / 4.5, 65 mm
144
Barton Women vs Converse College - 144
ISO 32000, 1/500 sec at f / 4.5, 65 mm
145
Barton Women vs Converse College - 145
ISO 32000, 1/400 sec at f / 4.5, 65 mm
146
Barton Women vs Converse College - 146
ISO 32000, 1/2500 sec at f / 4.5, 65 mm
147
Barton Women vs Converse College - 147
ISO 32000, 1/1250 sec at f / 4.5, 65 mm
148
Barton Women vs Converse College - 148
ISO 32000, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.5, 65 mm
149
Barton Women vs Converse College - 149
ISO 32000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
150
Barton Women vs Converse College - 150
ISO 32000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
151
Barton Women vs Converse College - 151
ISO 32000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
152
Barton Women vs Converse College - 152
ISO 32000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
153
Barton Women vs Converse College - 153
ISO 32000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
154
Barton Women vs Converse College - 154
ISO 32000, 1/320 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
155
Barton Women vs Converse College - 155
ISO 32000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
156
Barton Women vs Converse College - 156
ISO 32000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
157
Barton Women vs Converse College - 157
ISO 32000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
158
Barton Women vs Converse College - 158
ISO 32000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
159
Barton Women vs Converse College - 159
ISO 32000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
160
Barton Women vs Converse College - 160
ISO 32000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
161
Barton Women vs Converse College - 161
ISO 32000, 1/200 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
162
Barton Women vs Converse College - 162
ISO 32000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
163
Barton Women vs Converse College - 163
ISO 32000, 1/160 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
164
Barton Women vs Converse College - 164
ISO 32000, 1/250 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
165
Barton Women vs Converse College - 165
ISO 32000, 1/250 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
166
Barton Women vs Converse College - 166
ISO 32000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
167
Barton Women vs Converse College - 167
ISO 32000, 1/250 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
168
Barton Women vs Converse College - 168
ISO 32000, 1/160 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
169
Barton Women vs Converse College - 169
ISO 32000, 1/125 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
170
Barton Women vs Converse College - 170
ISO 32000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
171
Barton Women vs Converse College - 171
ISO 32000, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
172
Barton Women vs Converse College - 172
ISO 32000, 1/3200 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
173
Barton Women vs Converse College - 173
ISO 32000, 1/3200 sec at f / 7.1, 93 mm
174
Barton Women vs Converse College - 174
ISO 32000, 1/2500 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
175
Barton Women vs Converse College - 175
ISO 32000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
176
Barton Women vs Converse College - 176
ISO 32000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
177
Barton Women vs Converse College - 177
ISO 32000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
178
Barton Women vs Converse College - 178
ISO 32000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
179
Barton Women vs Converse College - 179
ISO 32000, 1/200 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
180
Barton Women vs Converse College - 180
ISO 32000, 1/200 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm