Back David Rembecki
Pages:<1 23 4 5 6 >
91
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -091
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
92
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -092
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 250 mm
93
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -093
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 250 mm
94
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -094
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
95
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -095
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
96
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -096
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
97
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -097
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
98
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -098
99
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -099
100
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -100
101
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -101
102
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -102
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 120 mm
103
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -103
104
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -104
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
105
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -105
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
106
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -106
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
107
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -107
108
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -108
109
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -109
110
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -110
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
111
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -111
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.5, 130 mm
112
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -112
113
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -113
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
114
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -114
115
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -115
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
116
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -116
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
117
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -117
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
118
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -118
ISO 2000, 1/2000 sec at f / 11, 350 mm
119
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -119
ISO 2000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
120
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -120
121
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -121
ISO 3200, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 230 mm
122
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -122
ISO 3200, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
123
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -123
124
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -124
125
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -125
ISO 3200, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
126
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -126
ISO 3200, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 400 mm
127
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -127
ISO 3200, 1/320 sec at f / 5.6, 300 mm
128
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -128
ISO 3200, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
129
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -129
ISO 3200, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 180 mm
130
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -130
ISO 3200, 1/1000 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
131
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -131
ISO 3200, 1/1250 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
132
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -132
ISO 3200, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
133
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -133
ISO 3200, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
134
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -134
ISO 3200, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 350 mm
135
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -135
ISO 3200, 1/250 sec at f / 5.6, 350 mm
136
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -136
ISO 3200, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 350 mm
137
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -137
ISO 3200, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 350 mm
138
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -138
139
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -139
ISO 3200, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 350 mm
140
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -140
141
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -141
142
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -142
143
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -143
144
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -144
ISO 3200, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 350 mm
145
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -145
ISO 3200, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
146
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -146
ISO 3200, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
147
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -147
ISO 3200, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
148
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -148
149
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -149
150
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -150
151
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -151
ISO 3200, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
152
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -152
ISO 3200, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
153
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -153
154
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -154
ISO 3200, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
155
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -155
ISO 3200, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 250 mm
156
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -156
157
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -157
158
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -158
ISO 3200, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
159
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -159
ISO 3200, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 230 mm
160
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -160
ISO 3200, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 230 mm
161
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -161
ISO 3200, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 230 mm
162
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -162
163
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -163
ISO 3200, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
164
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -164
165
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -165
166
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -166
167
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -167
168
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -168
ISO 3200, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
169
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -169
ISO 3200, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0, 140 mm
170
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -170
171
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -171
172
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -172
173
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -173
174
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -174
175
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -175
176
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -176
177
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -177
ISO 3200, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 130 mm
178
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -178
ISO 3200, 1/1000 sec at f / 4.5, 130 mm
179
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -179
ISO 3200, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.5, 130 mm
180
Barton Women vs St. Andrews -180
ISO 3200, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm