Site Title
2013 Barton Womens Soccer
G10 vs Lees-McRae College
91
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -091
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 300 mm
92
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -092
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 14, 300 mm
93
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -093
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 14, 300 mm
94
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -094
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 300 mm
95
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -095
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 16, 170 mm
96
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -096
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 16, 170 mm
97
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -097
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 18, 170 mm
98
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -098
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 16, 120 mm
99
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -099
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 18, 120 mm
100
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -100
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 16, 120 mm
101
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -101
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 16, 120 mm
102
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -102
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 230 mm
103
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -103
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 210 mm
104
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -104
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 10, 250 mm
105
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -105
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 9.0, 250 mm
106
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -106
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 10, 250 mm
107
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -107
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 13, 300 mm
108
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -108
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 200 mm
109
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -109
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 13, 200 mm
110
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -110
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 200 mm
111
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -111
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 200 mm
112
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -112
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 200 mm
113
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -113
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 200 mm
114
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -114
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 200 mm
115
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -115
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 10, 200 mm
116
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -116
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 10, 200 mm
117
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -117
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 10, 200 mm
118
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -118
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 200 mm
119
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -119
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 14, 270 mm
120
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -120
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 200 mm
121
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -121
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 10, 200 mm
122
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -122
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 200 mm
123
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -123
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 10, 200 mm
124
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -124
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 10, 200 mm
125
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -125
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 10, 200 mm
126
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -126
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 10, 200 mm
127
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -127
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 200 mm
128
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -128
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 200 mm
129
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -129
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 10, 200 mm
130
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -130
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 200 mm
131
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -131
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 158 mm
132
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -132
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 158 mm
133
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -133
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 13, 120 mm
134
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -134
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 13, 270 mm
135
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -135
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 14, 180 mm
136
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -136
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 16, 180 mm
137
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -137
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 14, 180 mm
138
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -138
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 14, 180 mm
139
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -139
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 13, 148 mm
140
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -140
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 14, 148 mm
141
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -141
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 14, 148 mm
142
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -142
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 14, 148 mm
143
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -143
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 14, 148 mm
144
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -144
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 14, 148 mm
145
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -145
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 14, 148 mm
146
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -146
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 14, 148 mm
147
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -147
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 270 mm
148
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -148
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 270 mm
149
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -149
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 13, 270 mm
150
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -150
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 13, 270 mm
151
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -151
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 170 mm
152
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -152
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 14, 140 mm
153
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -153
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 13, 120 mm
154
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -154
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 14, 120 mm
155
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -155
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 14, 120 mm
156
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -156
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 230 mm
157
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -157
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 14, 158 mm
158
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -158
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 230 mm
159
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -159
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 230 mm
160
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -160
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 230 mm
161
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -161
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 230 mm
162
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -162
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 230 mm
163
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -163
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 230 mm
164
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -164
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 230 mm
165
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -165
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 230 mm
166
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -166
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 230 mm
167
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -167
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 230 mm
168
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -168
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 230 mm
169
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -169
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 230 mm
170
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -170
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 230 mm
171
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -171
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 230 mm
172
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -172
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 230 mm
173
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -173
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 230 mm
174
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -174
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 230 mm
175
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -175
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 230 mm
176
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -176
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 180 mm
177
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -177
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 11, 158 mm
178
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -178
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 13, 158 mm
179
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -179
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 14, 158 mm
180
Barton Women vs Lees-McRae -180
ISO 1000, 1/500 sec at f / 14, 158 mm