Back David Rembecki
Pages:<3 4 5 6 7 89 >
631
Barton Men vs King University - 631
ISO 2000, 1/250 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
632
Barton Men vs King University - 632
633
Barton Men vs King University - 633
ISO 2000, 1/200 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
634
Barton Men vs King University - 634
635
Barton Men vs King University - 635
636
Barton Men vs King University - 636
637
Barton Men vs King University - 637
638
Barton Men vs King University - 638
639
Barton Men vs King University - 639
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
640
Barton Men vs King University - 640
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
641
Barton Men vs King University - 641
ISO 2000, 1/1250 sec at f / 4.5, 50 mm
642
Barton Men vs King University - 642
ISO 2000, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.5, 50 mm
643
Barton Men vs King University - 643
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
644
Barton Men vs King University - 644
645
Barton Men vs King University - 645
646
Barton Men vs King University - 646
647
Barton Men vs King University - 647
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
648
Barton Men vs King University - 648
649
Barton Men vs King University - 649
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
650
Barton Men vs King University - 650
651
Barton Men vs King University - 651
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
652
Barton Men vs King University - 652
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
653
Barton Men vs King University - 653
ISO 2000, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
654
Barton Men vs King University - 654
655
Barton Men vs King University - 655
ISO 2000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 113 mm
656
Barton Men vs King University - 656
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 4.5, 75 mm
657
Barton Men vs King University - 657
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
658
Barton Men vs King University - 658
659
Barton Men vs King University - 659
660
Barton Men vs King University - 660
ISO 2000, 1/200 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
661
Barton Men vs King University - 661
ISO 2000, 1/250 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
662
Barton Men vs King University - 662
663
Barton Men vs King University - 663
664
Barton Men vs King University - 664
ISO 2000, 1/320 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
665
Barton Men vs King University - 665
666
Barton Men vs King University - 666
667
Barton Men vs King University - 667
668
Barton Men vs King University - 668
669
Barton Men vs King University - 669
670
Barton Men vs King University - 670
671
Barton Men vs King University - 671
672
Barton Men vs King University - 672
673
Barton Men vs King University - 673
674
Barton Men vs King University - 674
675
Barton Men vs King University - 675
ISO 2000, 1/800 sec at f / 4.5, 50 mm
676
Barton Men vs King University - 676
ISO 2000, 1/200 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
677
Barton Men vs King University - 677
ISO 2000, 1/125 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
678
Barton Men vs King University - 678
ISO 2000, 1/250 sec at f / 5.6, 240 mm
679
Barton Men vs King University - 679
680
Barton Men vs King University - 680
681
Barton Men vs King University - 681
682
Barton Men vs King University - 682
683
Barton Men vs King University - 683
ISO 2000, 1/400 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
684
Barton Men vs King University - 684
ISO 2000, 1/250 sec at f / 6.3, 290 mm
685
Barton Men vs King University - 685
ISO 2000, 1/320 sec at f / 5.6, 200 mm
686
Barton Men vs King University - 686
687
Barton Men vs King University - 687
688
Barton Men vs King University - 688
689
Barton Men vs King University - 689
690
Barton Men vs King University - 690
691
Barton Men vs King University - 691
692
Barton Men vs King University - 692
693
Barton Men vs King University - 693
694
Barton Men vs King University - 694
ISO 2000, 1/200 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
695
Barton Men vs King University - 695
696
Barton Men vs King University - 696
ISO 2000, 1/320 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
697
Barton Men vs King University - 697
698
Barton Men vs King University - 698
699
Barton Men vs King University - 699
ISO 5000, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
700
Barton Men vs King University - 700
ISO 5000, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.5, 65 mm
701
Barton Men vs King University - 701
702
Barton Men vs King University - 702
ISO 5000, 1/1250 sec at f / 4.5, 65 mm
703
Barton Men vs King University - 703
ISO 5000, 1/1000 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
704
Barton Men vs King University - 704
705
Barton Men vs King University - 705
706
Barton Men vs King University - 706
ISO 5000, 1/800 sec at f / 6.3, 330 mm
707
Barton Men vs King University - 707
708
Barton Men vs King University - 708
709
Barton Men vs King University - 709
ISO 5000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 140 mm
710
Barton Men vs King University - 710
711
Barton Men vs King University - 711
712
Barton Men vs King University - 712
ISO 5000, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 93 mm
713
Barton Men vs King University - 713
714
Barton Men vs King University - 714
715
Barton Men vs King University - 715
716
Barton Men vs King University - 716
717
Barton Men vs King University - 717
ISO 5000, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
718
Barton Men vs King University - 718
ISO 5000, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 170 mm
719
Barton Men vs King University - 719
720
Barton Men vs King University - 720