Back David Rembecki
Pages:<1 23 4 5 6 >
91
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -091
ISO 1600, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
92
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -092
ISO 1600, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6, 230 mm
93
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -093
ISO 1600, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 140 mm
94
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -094
ISO 1600, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 140 mm
95
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -095
ISO 1600, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0, 158 mm
96
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -096
97
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -097
98
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -098
99
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -099
ISO 1600, 1/2000 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
100
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -100
101
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -101
102
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -102
103
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -103
ISO 1600, 1/2500 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
104
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -104
105
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -105
106
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -106
ISO 1600, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
107
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -107
108
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -108
ISO 1600, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
109
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -109
110
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -110
ISO 1600, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
111
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -111
112
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -112
113
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -113
114
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -114
115
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -115
ISO 1600, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 230 mm
116
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -116
ISO 1600, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 250 mm
117
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -117
118
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -118
119
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -119
120
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -120
ISO 1600, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 148 mm
121
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -121
122
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -122
123
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -123
124
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -124
ISO 1600, 1/1250 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
125
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -125
126
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -126
ISO 1600, 1/1600 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
127
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -127
ISO 1600, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 300 mm
128
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -128
129
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -129
ISO 1600, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
130
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -130
ISO 1600, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0, 170 mm
131
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -131
ISO 1600, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
132
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -132
133
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -133
134
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -134
ISO 1600, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 250 mm
135
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -135
ISO 1600, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0, 180 mm
136
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -136
ISO 1600, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 180 mm
137
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -137
ISO 1600, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 180 mm
138
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -138
ISO 1600, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 300 mm
139
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -139
140
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -140
141
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -141
142
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -142
143
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -143
ISO 1600, 1/320 sec at f / 5.6, 230 mm
144
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -144
ISO 1600, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 230 mm
145
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -145
ISO 1600, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
146
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -146
ISO 1600, 1/500 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
147
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -147
148
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -148
ISO 1600, 1/500 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
149
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -149
150
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -150
151
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -151
ISO 1600, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
152
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -152
153
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -153
ISO 1600, 1/400 sec at f / 5.6, 320 mm
154
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -154
155
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -155
156
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -156
ISO 1600, 1/2000 sec at f / 5.0, 170 mm
157
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -157
ISO 1600, 1/3200 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
158
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -158
ISO 1600, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.0, 170 mm
159
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -159
160
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -160
161
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -161
ISO 1600, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0, 180 mm
162
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -162
ISO 1600, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6, 270 mm
163
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -163
ISO 1600, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
164
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -164
165
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -165
166
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -166
167
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -167
ISO 1600, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
168
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -168
ISO 1600, 1/320 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
169
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -169
170
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -170
171
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -171
ISO 1600, 1/250 sec at f / 5.6, 210 mm
172
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -172
173
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -173
174
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -174
175
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -175
176
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -176
177
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -177
ISO 1600, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
178
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -178
179
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -179
ISO 1600, 1/1000 sec at f / 4.5, 120 mm
180
Barton Men vs Belmont Abbey -180