Site Title
2012 Barton Bulldog Mens Soccer
Barton vs Belmont Abbey, September, 12
91
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -091
ISO 16000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
92
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -092
ISO 16000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
93
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -093
ISO 16000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
94
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -094
ISO 16000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
95
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -095
ISO 16000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
96
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -096
ISO 16000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 105 mm
97
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -097
ISO 16000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 93 mm
98
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -098
ISO 16000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 93 mm
99
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -099
ISO 16000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 93 mm
100
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -100
ISO 16000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 93 mm
101
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -101
ISO 16000, 1/320 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
102
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -102
ISO 16000, 1/320 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
103
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -103
ISO 16000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
104
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -104
ISO 16000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
105
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -105
ISO 16000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
106
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -106
ISO 16000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
107
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -107
ISO 16000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
108
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -108
ISO 16000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
109
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -109
ISO 16000, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
110
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -110
ISO 16000, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
111
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -111
ISO 16000, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
112
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -112
ISO 16000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
113
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -113
ISO 16000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
114
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -114
ISO 16000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
115
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -115
ISO 16000, 1/320 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
116
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -116
ISO 16000, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
117
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -117
ISO 16000, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
118
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -118
ISO 16000, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 105 mm
119
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -119
ISO 16000, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 105 mm
120
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -120
ISO 16000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
121
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -121
ISO 16000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
122
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -122
ISO 16000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
123
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -123
ISO 16000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
124
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -124
ISO 16000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
125
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -125
ISO 16000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 180 mm
126
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -126
ISO 16000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
127
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -127
ISO 16000, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
128
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -128
ISO 16000, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
129
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -129
ISO 16000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
130
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -130
ISO 16000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
131
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -131
ISO 16000, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
132
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -132
ISO 16000, 1/320 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
133
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -133
ISO 16000, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
134
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -134
ISO 16000, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
135
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -135
ISO 16000, 1/320 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
136
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -136
ISO 16000, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
137
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -137
ISO 16000, 1/320 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
138
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -138
ISO 16000, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
139
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -139
ISO 16000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
140
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -140
ISO 16000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
141
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -141
ISO 16000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
142
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -142
ISO 16000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
143
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -143
ISO 16000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
144
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -144
ISO 16000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
145
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -145
ISO 16000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 170 mm
146
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -146
ISO 16000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
147
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -147
ISO 16000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
148
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -148
ISO 16000, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
149
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -149
ISO 16000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 145 mm
150
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -150
ISO 16000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
151
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -151
ISO 16000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
152
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -152
ISO 16000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
153
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -153
ISO 16000, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
154
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -154
ISO 16000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
155
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -155
ISO 16000, 1/320 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
156
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -156
ISO 16000, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 78 mm
157
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -157
ISO 16000, 1/320 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
158
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -158
ISO 16000, 1/320 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
159
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -159
ISO 16000, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
160
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -160
ISO 16000, 1/320 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
161
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -161
ISO 16000, 1/320 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
162
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -162
ISO 16000, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
163
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -163
ISO 16000, 1/320 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
164
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -164
ISO 16000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
165
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -165
ISO 16000, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
166
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -166
ISO 16000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
167
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -167
ISO 16000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
168
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -168
ISO 16000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
169
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -169
ISO 16000, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
170
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -170
ISO 16000, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
171
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -171
ISO 16000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
172
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -172
ISO 16000, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
173
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -173
ISO 16000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
174
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -174
ISO 16000, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 98 mm
175
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -175
ISO 16000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
176
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -176
ISO 16000, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
177
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -177
ISO 16000, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
178
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -178
ISO 16000, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
179
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -179
ISO 16000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
180
G9 Barton vs Belmnt Abbey (H) -180
ISO 16000, 1/320 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm