Back David Rembecki
Pages:<1 2
251
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -251
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
252
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -252
253
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -253
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
254
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -254
255
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -255
ISO 12800, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
256
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -256
257
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -257
258
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -258
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
259
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -259
260
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -260
261
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -261
262
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -262
263
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -263
ISO 12800, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
264
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -264
265
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -265
ISO 12800, 1/125 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
266
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -266
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
267
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -267
268
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -268
269
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -269
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
270
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -270
271
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -271
ISO 12800, 1/125 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
272
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -272
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
273
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -273
274
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -274
275
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -275
276
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -276
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
277
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -277
278
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -278
ISO 12800, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 93 mm
279
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -279
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 98 mm
280
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -280
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 93 mm
281
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -281
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
282
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -282
ISO 12800, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
283
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -283
ISO 12800, 1/2500 sec at f / 3.5, 200 mm
284
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -284
285
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -285
286
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -286
ISO 12800, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
287
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -287
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
288
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -288
289
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -289
290
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -290
291
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -291
ISO 12800, 1/160 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
292
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -292
ISO 16000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
293
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -293
294
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -294
ISO 16000, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.5, 200 mm
295
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -295
ISO 16000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
296
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -296
ISO 16000, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.5, 118 mm
297
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -297
298
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -298
299
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -299
300
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -300
301
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -301
302
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -302
303
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -303
ISO 16000, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.5, 128 mm
304
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -304
ISO 16000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
305
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -305
ISO 16000, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
306
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -306
307
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -307
308
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -308
ISO 16000, 1/2000 sec at f / 3.2, 200 mm
309
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -309
ISO 16000, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
310
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -310
311
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -311
312
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -312
313
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -313
ISO 16000, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
314
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -314
ISO 16000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
315
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -315
ISO 16000, 1/320 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
316
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -316
317
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -317
ISO 16000, 1/160 sec at f / 8.0, 128 mm
318
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -318
ISO 16000, 1/160 sec at f / 6.3, 105 mm
319
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -319
ISO 16000, 1/160 sec at f / 8.0, 118 mm
320
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -320
ISO 16000, 1/160 sec at f / 9.0, 118 mm
321
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -321
ISO 16000, 1/160 sec at f / 11, 200 mm
322
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -322
323
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -323
ISO 16000, 1/160 sec at f / 14, 110 mm
324
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -324
325
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -325
ISO 16000, 1/160 sec at f / 10, 200 mm
326
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -326
ISO 16000, 1/160 sec at f / 4.5, 200 mm
327
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -327
328
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -328
ISO 16000, 1/160 sec at f / 5.0, 200 mm
329
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -329
ISO 16000, 1/160 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
330
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -330
ISO 16000, 1/80 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
331
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -331
ISO 16000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
332
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -332
333
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -333
ISO 20000, 1/200 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
334
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -334
ISO 20000, 1/160 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
335
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -335
ISO 20000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 155 mm
336
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -336
ISO 20000, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
337
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -337
338
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -338
339
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -339
340
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -340
341
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -341
ISO 20000, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
342
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -342
ISO 20000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
343
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -343
ISO 20000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
344
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -344
ISO 20000, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
345
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -345
346
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -346
347
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -347
348
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -348
ISO 20000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
349
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -349
ISO 20000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
350
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -350
ISO 8000, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
351
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -351
ISO 8000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
352
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -352
ISO 8000, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
353
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -353
ISO 8000, 1/200 sec at f / 2.8, 70 mm
354
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -354
355
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -355
356
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -356
ISO 8000, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
357
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -357
358
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -358
ISO 8000, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
359
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -359
360
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -360
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.2, 145 mm
361
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -361
ISO 12800, 1/320 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
362
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -362
ISO 12800, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8, 200 mm
363
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -363
364
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -364
ISO 12800, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
365
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -365
ISO 12800, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 110 mm
366
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -366
367
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -367
368
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -368
ISO 12800, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
369
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -369
ISO 12800, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
370
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -370
371
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -371
372
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -372
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.2, 135 mm
373
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -373
374
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -374
ISO 12800, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
375
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -375
ISO 12800, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
376
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -376
ISO 12800, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8, 135 mm
377
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -377
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 128 mm
378
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -378
ISO 12800, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8, 118 mm
379
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -379
380
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -380
381
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -381
ISO 12800, 1/1600 sec at f / 3.5, 83 mm
382
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -382
383
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -383
ISO 12800, 1/200 sec at f / 2.8, 98 mm
384
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -384
385
Barton vs UNC Pembroke -385
ISO 12800, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8, 98 mm