Site Title
2011 TFC White SCSA Charlotte Invitational
93 TFC White vs Norcross
1
93 TFC White vs Norcross -001
ISO 500, 128 mm, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8
2
93 TFC White vs Norcross -002
ISO 500, 128 mm, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8
3
93 TFC White vs Norcross -003
ISO 500, 128 mm, 1/250 sec at f / 2.8
4
93 TFC White vs Norcross -004
ISO 500, 78 mm, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8
5
93 TFC White vs Norcross -005
ISO 500, 145 mm, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8
6
93 TFC White vs Norcross -006
ISO 500, 145 mm, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8
7
93 TFC White vs Norcross -007
ISO 500, 145 mm, 1/500 sec at f / 2.8
8
93 TFC White vs Norcross -008
ISO 500, 145 mm, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8
9
93 TFC White vs Norcross -009
ISO 500, 93 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.2
10
93 TFC White vs Norcross -010
ISO 500, 93 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.2
11
93 TFC White vs Norcross -011
ISO 500, 93 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.2
12
93 TFC White vs Norcross -012
ISO 500, 93 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.2
13
93 TFC White vs Norcross -013
ISO 500, 88 mm, 1/400 sec at f / 2.8
14
93 TFC White vs Norcross -014
ISO 800, 145 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
15
93 TFC White vs Norcross -015
ISO 800, 145 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
16
93 TFC White vs Norcross -016
ISO 800, 145 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
17
93 TFC White vs Norcross -017
ISO 800, 155 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.5
18
93 TFC White vs Norcross -018
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
19
93 TFC White vs Norcross -019
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
20
93 TFC White vs Norcross -020
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
21
93 TFC White vs Norcross -021
ISO 800, 170 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.5
22
93 TFC White vs Norcross -022
ISO 800, 170 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.5
23
93 TFC White vs Norcross -023
ISO 800, 155 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5
24
93 TFC White vs Norcross -024
ISO 800, 105 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.5
25
93 TFC White vs Norcross -025
ISO 800, 105 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.5
26
93 TFC White vs Norcross -026
ISO 800, 98 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.2
27
93 TFC White vs Norcross -027
ISO 800, 98 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.5
28
93 TFC White vs Norcross -028
ISO 800, 98 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.2
29
93 TFC White vs Norcross -029
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
30
93 TFC White vs Norcross -030
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
31
93 TFC White vs Norcross -031
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
32
93 TFC White vs Norcross -032
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
33
93 TFC White vs Norcross -033
ISO 800, 128 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
34
93 TFC White vs Norcross -034
ISO 800, 128 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.5
35
93 TFC White vs Norcross -035
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.5
36
93 TFC White vs Norcross -036
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
37
93 TFC White vs Norcross -037
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
38
93 TFC White vs Norcross -038
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
39
93 TFC White vs Norcross -039
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
40
93 TFC White vs Norcross -040
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
41
93 TFC White vs Norcross -041
ISO 800, 135 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
42
93 TFC White vs Norcross -042
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5
43
93 TFC White vs Norcross -043
ISO 800, 128 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
44
93 TFC White vs Norcross -044
ISO 800, 128 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
45
93 TFC White vs Norcross -045
ISO 800, 128 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
46
93 TFC White vs Norcross -046
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.2
47
93 TFC White vs Norcross -047
ISO 800, 145 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
48
93 TFC White vs Norcross -048
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.2
49
93 TFC White vs Norcross -049
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.5
50
93 TFC White vs Norcross -050
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.5
51
93 TFC White vs Norcross -051
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.5
52
93 TFC White vs Norcross -052
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.2
53
93 TFC White vs Norcross -053
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8
54
93 TFC White vs Norcross -054
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
55
93 TFC White vs Norcross -055
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.5
56
93 TFC White vs Norcross -056
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
57
93 TFC White vs Norcross -057
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 2.8
58
93 TFC White vs Norcross -058
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5
59
93 TFC White vs Norcross -059
ISO 800, 170 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
60
93 TFC White vs Norcross -060
ISO 800, 170 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
61
93 TFC White vs Norcross -061
ISO 800, 180 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
62
93 TFC White vs Norcross -062
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5
63
93 TFC White vs Norcross -063
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
64
93 TFC White vs Norcross -064
ISO 800, 135 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
65
93 TFC White vs Norcross -065
ISO 800, 135 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
66
93 TFC White vs Norcross -066
ISO 800, 135 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
67
93 TFC White vs Norcross -067
ISO 800, 135 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5
68
93 TFC White vs Norcross -068
ISO 800, 135 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
69
93 TFC White vs Norcross -069
ISO 800, 128 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
70
93 TFC White vs Norcross -070
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
71
93 TFC White vs Norcross -071
ISO 800, 88 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
72
93 TFC White vs Norcross -072
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5
73
93 TFC White vs Norcross -073
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
74
93 TFC White vs Norcross -074
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
75
93 TFC White vs Norcross -075
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
76
93 TFC White vs Norcross -076
ISO 800, 88 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
77
93 TFC White vs Norcross -077
ISO 800, 88 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
78
93 TFC White vs Norcross -078
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
79
93 TFC White vs Norcross -079
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.5
80
93 TFC White vs Norcross -080
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.2
81
93 TFC White vs Norcross -081
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.2
82
93 TFC White vs Norcross -082
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.2
83
93 TFC White vs Norcross -083
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.2
84
93 TFC White vs Norcross -084
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.2
85
93 TFC White vs Norcross -085
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.2
86
93 TFC White vs Norcross -086
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.2
87
93 TFC White vs Norcross -087
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.5
88
93 TFC White vs Norcross -088
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.5
89
93 TFC White vs Norcross -089
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.5
90
93 TFC White vs Norcross -090
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
91
93 TFC White vs Norcross -091
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.5
92
93 TFC White vs Norcross -092
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.5
93
93 TFC White vs Norcross -093
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
94
93 TFC White vs Norcross -094
ISO 800, 98 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
95
93 TFC White vs Norcross -095
ISO 800, 98 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
96
93 TFC White vs Norcross -096
ISO 800, 98 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.5
97
93 TFC White vs Norcross -097
ISO 800, 98 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
98
93 TFC White vs Norcross -098
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5
99
93 TFC White vs Norcross -099
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
100
93 TFC White vs Norcross -100
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5
101
93 TFC White vs Norcross -101
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
102
93 TFC White vs Norcross -102
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5
103
93 TFC White vs Norcross -103
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
104
93 TFC White vs Norcross -104
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
105
93 TFC White vs Norcross -105
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
106
93 TFC White vs Norcross -106
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
107
93 TFC White vs Norcross -107
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
108
93 TFC White vs Norcross -108
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
109
93 TFC White vs Norcross -109
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
110
93 TFC White vs Norcross -110
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
111
93 TFC White vs Norcross -111
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
112
93 TFC White vs Norcross -112
ISO 800, 145 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5
113
93 TFC White vs Norcross -113
ISO 800, 88 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
114
93 TFC White vs Norcross -114
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5
115
93 TFC White vs Norcross -115
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
116
93 TFC White vs Norcross -116
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
117
93 TFC White vs Norcross -117
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
118
93 TFC White vs Norcross -118
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
119
93 TFC White vs Norcross -119
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
120
93 TFC White vs Norcross -120
ISO 800, 105 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5
121
93 TFC White vs Norcross -121
ISO 800, 128 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
122
93 TFC White vs Norcross -122
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
123
93 TFC White vs Norcross -123
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
124
93 TFC White vs Norcross -124
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
125
93 TFC White vs Norcross -125
ISO 800, 105 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5
126
93 TFC White vs Norcross -126
ISO 800, 98 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5
127
93 TFC White vs Norcross -127
ISO 800, 98 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5
128
93 TFC White vs Norcross -128
ISO 800, 135 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 3.5
129
93 TFC White vs Norcross -129
ISO 800, 135 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
130
93 TFC White vs Norcross -130
ISO 800, 135 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
131
93 TFC White vs Norcross -131
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
132
93 TFC White vs Norcross -132
ISO 800, 145 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.0
133
93 TFC White vs Norcross -133
ISO 800, 128 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5
134
93 TFC White vs Norcross -134
ISO 800, 98 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5
135
93 TFC White vs Norcross -135
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
136
93 TFC White vs Norcross -136
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
137
93 TFC White vs Norcross -137
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.0
138
93 TFC White vs Norcross -138
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5
139
93 TFC White vs Norcross -139
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 4.5
140
93 TFC White vs Norcross -140
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8
141
93 TFC White vs Norcross -141
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8
142
93 TFC White vs Norcross -142
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8
143
93 TFC White vs Norcross -143
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8
144
93 TFC White vs Norcross -144
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8
145
93 TFC White vs Norcross -145
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8
146
93 TFC White vs Norcross -146
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8
147
93 TFC White vs Norcross -147
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
148
93 TFC White vs Norcross -148
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
149
93 TFC White vs Norcross -149
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
150
93 TFC White vs Norcross -150
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8
151
93 TFC White vs Norcross -151
ISO 800, 155 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8
152
93 TFC White vs Norcross -152
ISO 800, 155 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8
153
93 TFC White vs Norcross -153
ISO 800, 155 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8
154
93 TFC White vs Norcross -154
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
155
93 TFC White vs Norcross -155
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
156
93 TFC White vs Norcross -156
ISO 800, 145 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
157
93 TFC White vs Norcross -157
ISO 800, 98 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
158
93 TFC White vs Norcross -158
ISO 800, 98 mm, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8
159
93 TFC White vs Norcross -159
ISO 800, 83 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
160
93 TFC White vs Norcross -160
ISO 800, 155 mm, 1/800 sec at f / 2.8
161
93 TFC White vs Norcross -161
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8
162
93 TFC White vs Norcross -162
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8
163
93 TFC White vs Norcross -163
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8
164
93 TFC White vs Norcross -164
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8
165
93 TFC White vs Norcross -165
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8
166
93 TFC White vs Norcross -166
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.5
167
93 TFC White vs Norcross -167
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.5
168
93 TFC White vs Norcross -168
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8
169
93 TFC White vs Norcross -169
ISO 800, 105 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.2
170
93 TFC White vs Norcross -170
ISO 800, 105 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.2
171
93 TFC White vs Norcross -171
ISO 800, 105 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.2
172
93 TFC White vs Norcross -172
ISO 800, 105 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.2
173
93 TFC White vs Norcross -173
ISO 800, 105 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.2
174
93 TFC White vs Norcross -174
ISO 800, 78 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.2
175
93 TFC White vs Norcross -175
ISO 800, 155 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
176
93 TFC White vs Norcross -176
ISO 800, 98 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.5
177
93 TFC White vs Norcross -177
ISO 800, 98 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.5
178
93 TFC White vs Norcross -178
ISO 800, 98 mm, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8
179
93 TFC White vs Norcross -179
ISO 800, 98 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.5
180
93 TFC White vs Norcross -180
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.2
181
93 TFC White vs Norcross -181
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 2.8
182
93 TFC White vs Norcross -182
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.2
183
93 TFC White vs Norcross -183
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.2
184
93 TFC White vs Norcross -184
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.2
185
93 TFC White vs Norcross -185
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8
186
93 TFC White vs Norcross -186
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8
187
93 TFC White vs Norcross -187
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
188
93 TFC White vs Norcross -188
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
189
93 TFC White vs Norcross -189
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8
190
93 TFC White vs Norcross -190
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8
191
93 TFC White vs Norcross -191
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
192
93 TFC White vs Norcross -192
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
193
93 TFC White vs Norcross -193
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.2
194
93 TFC White vs Norcross -194
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8
195
93 TFC White vs Norcross -195
ISO 800, 135 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.2
196
93 TFC White vs Norcross -196
ISO 800, 135 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8
197
93 TFC White vs Norcross -197
ISO 800, 135 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8
198
93 TFC White vs Norcross -198
ISO 800, 170 mm, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8
199
93 TFC White vs Norcross -199
ISO 800, 128 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.2
200
93 TFC White vs Norcross -200
ISO 800, 128 mm, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8
201
93 TFC White vs Norcross -201
ISO 800, 128 mm, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8
202
93 TFC White vs Norcross -202
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.2
203
93 TFC White vs Norcross -203
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.2
204
93 TFC White vs Norcross -204
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 3.2
205
93 TFC White vs Norcross -205
ISO 800, 155 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8
206
93 TFC White vs Norcross -206
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8
207
93 TFC White vs Norcross -207
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8
208
93 TFC White vs Norcross -208
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8
209
93 TFC White vs Norcross -209
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8
210
93 TFC White vs Norcross -210
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
211
93 TFC White vs Norcross -211
ISO 800, 170 mm, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8
212
93 TFC White vs Norcross -212
ISO 800, 170 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
213
93 TFC White vs Norcross -213
ISO 800, 170 mm, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8
214
93 TFC White vs Norcross -214
ISO 800, 170 mm, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8
215
93 TFC White vs Norcross -215
ISO 800, 170 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
216
93 TFC White vs Norcross -216
ISO 800, 170 mm, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8
217
93 TFC White vs Norcross -217
ISO 800, 170 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
218
93 TFC White vs Norcross -218
ISO 800, 93 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
219
93 TFC White vs Norcross -219
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
220
93 TFC White vs Norcross -220
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8
221
93 TFC White vs Norcross -221
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8
222
93 TFC White vs Norcross -222
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8
223
93 TFC White vs Norcross -223
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8
224
93 TFC White vs Norcross -224
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8
225
93 TFC White vs Norcross -225
ISO 800, 118 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8
226
93 TFC White vs Norcross -226
ISO 800, 78 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
227
93 TFC White vs Norcross -227
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8
228
93 TFC White vs Norcross -228
ISO 800, 105 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8
229
93 TFC White vs Norcross -229
ISO 800, 135 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8
230
93 TFC White vs Norcross -230
ISO 800, 135 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8
231
93 TFC White vs Norcross -231
ISO 800, 145 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8
232
93 TFC White vs Norcross -232
ISO 800, 110 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8
233
93 TFC White vs Norcross -233
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8
234
93 TFC White vs Norcross -234
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 2.8
235
93 TFC White vs Norcross -235
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/3200 sec at f / 2.8
236
93 TFC White vs Norcross -236
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/2500 sec at f / 2.8
237
93 TFC White vs Norcross -237
ISO 800, 128 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 2.8
238
93 TFC White vs Norcross -238
ISO 800, 128 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8
239
93 TFC White vs Norcross -239
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 2.8
240
93 TFC White vs Norcross -240
ISO 800, 155 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
241
93 TFC White vs Norcross -241
ISO 800, 70 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 2.8
242
93 TFC White vs Norcross -242
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
243
93 TFC White vs Norcross -243
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8
244
93 TFC White vs Norcross -244
ISO 800, 200 mm, 1/2000 sec at f / 2.8