Site Title
2011 TFC White Season Games
93 TFC White vs CASL Premier
116
TFC vs CASL Premier -116
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6
117
TFC vs CASL Premier -117
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6
118
TFC vs CASL Premier -118
ISO 500, 200 mm, 1/500 sec at f / 5.0
119
TFC vs CASL Premier -119
ISO 500, 200 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0
120
TFC vs CASL Premier -120
ISO 500, 200 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.0
121
TFC vs CASL Premier -121
ISO 500, 200 mm, 1/800 sec at f / 5.0
122
TFC vs CASL Premier -122
ISO 500, 270 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6
123
TFC vs CASL Premier -123
ISO 500, 250 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
124
TFC vs CASL Premier -124
ISO 500, 250 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6
125
TFC vs CASL Premier -125
ISO 500, 250 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 7.1
126
TFC vs CASL Premier -126
ISO 500, 400 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 8.0
127
TFC vs CASL Premier -127
ISO 500, 400 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 7.1
128
TFC vs CASL Premier -128
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6
129
TFC vs CASL Premier -129
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6
130
TFC vs CASL Premier -130
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
131
TFC vs CASL Premier -131
ISO 500, 320 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6
132
TFC vs CASL Premier -132
ISO 500, 270 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
133
TFC vs CASL Premier -133
ISO 500, 270 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 8.0
134
TFC vs CASL Premier -134
ISO 500, 230 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
135
TFC vs CASL Premier -135
ISO 500, 170 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 9.0
136
TFC vs CASL Premier -136
ISO 500, 400 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6
137
TFC vs CASL Premier -137
ISO 500, 270 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 8.0
138
TFC vs CASL Premier -138
ISO 500, 270 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 7.1
139
TFC vs CASL Premier -139
ISO 500, 270 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
140
TFC vs CASL Premier -140
ISO 500, 270 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
141
TFC vs CASL Premier -141
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 7.1
142
TFC vs CASL Premier -142
ISO 500, 200 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 11
143
TFC vs CASL Premier -143
ISO 500, 200 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
144
TFC vs CASL Premier -144
ISO 500, 158 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 7.1
145
TFC vs CASL Premier -145
ISO 500, 158 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
146
TFC vs CASL Premier -146
ISO 500, 158 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
147
TFC vs CASL Premier -147
ISO 500, 158 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 7.1
148
TFC vs CASL Premier -148
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6
149
TFC vs CASL Premier -149
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6
150
TFC vs CASL Premier -150
ISO 500, 250 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
151
TFC vs CASL Premier -151
ISO 500, 250 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 7.1
152
TFC vs CASL Premier -152
ISO 500, 250 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 14
153
TFC vs CASL Premier -153
ISO 500, 250 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 8.0
154
TFC vs CASL Premier -154
ISO 500, 158 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0
155
TFC vs CASL Premier -155
ISO 500, 400 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
156
TFC vs CASL Premier -156
ISO 500, 250 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 7.1
157
TFC vs CASL Premier -157
ISO 500, 250 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
158
TFC vs CASL Premier -158
ISO 500, 200 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
159
TFC vs CASL Premier -159
ISO 500, 120 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 8.0
160
TFC vs CASL Premier -160
ISO 500, 120 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6
161
TFC vs CASL Premier -161
ISO 500, 120 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
162
TFC vs CASL Premier -162
ISO 500, 120 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0
163
TFC vs CASL Premier -163
ISO 500, 120 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 4.5
164
TFC vs CASL Premier -164
ISO 500, 180 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 8.0
165
TFC vs CASL Premier -165
ISO 500, 180 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
166
TFC vs CASL Premier -166
ISO 500, 180 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
167
TFC vs CASL Premier -167
ISO 500, 120 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0
168
TFC vs CASL Premier -168
ISO 500, 120 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6
169
TFC vs CASL Premier -169
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6
170
TFC vs CASL Premier -170
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6
171
TFC vs CASL Premier -171
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 7.1
172
TFC vs CASL Premier -172
ISO 500, 158 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 8.0
173
TFC vs CASL Premier -173
ISO 500, 158 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
174
TFC vs CASL Premier -174
ISO 500, 158 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 7.1
175
TFC vs CASL Premier -175
ISO 500, 158 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 8.0
176
TFC vs CASL Premier -176
ISO 500, 158 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 11
177
TFC vs CASL Premier -177
ISO 500, 250 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 7.1
178
TFC vs CASL Premier -178
ISO 500, 200 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
179
TFC vs CASL Premier -179
ISO 500, 300 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6
180
TFC vs CASL Premier -180
ISO 500, 300 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
181
TFC vs CASL Premier -181
ISO 500, 300 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
182
TFC vs CASL Premier -182
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6
183
TFC vs CASL Premier -183
ISO 500, 200 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
184
TFC vs CASL Premier -184
ISO 500, 158 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 7.1
185
TFC vs CASL Premier -185
ISO 500, 300 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 10
186
TFC vs CASL Premier -186
ISO 500, 250 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6
187
TFC vs CASL Premier -187
ISO 500, 250 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6
188
TFC vs CASL Premier -188
ISO 500, 250 mm, 1/800 sec at f / 5.6
189
TFC vs CASL Premier -189
ISO 500, 250 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6
190
TFC vs CASL Premier -190
ISO 500, 200 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.0
191
TFC vs CASL Premier -191
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6
192
TFC vs CASL Premier -192
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
193
TFC vs CASL Premier -193
ISO 500, 400 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6
194
TFC vs CASL Premier -194
ISO 500, 158 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 7.1
195
TFC vs CASL Premier -195
ISO 500, 158 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 7.1
196
TFC vs CASL Premier -196
ISO 500, 180 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 7.1
197
TFC vs CASL Premier -197
ISO 500, 180 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6
198
TFC vs CASL Premier -198
ISO 500, 400 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6
199
TFC vs CASL Premier -199
ISO 500, 200 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.0
200
TFC vs CASL Premier -200
ISO 500, 400 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6
201
TFC vs CASL Premier -201
ISO 500, 400 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
202
TFC vs CASL Premier -202
ISO 500, 400 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6
203
TFC vs CASL Premier -203
ISO 500, 400 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6
204
TFC vs CASL Premier -204
ISO 500, 230 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 8.0
205
TFC vs CASL Premier -205
ISO 500, 230 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6
206
TFC vs CASL Premier -206
ISO 500, 230 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6
207
TFC vs CASL Premier -207
ISO 500, 230 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6
208
TFC vs CASL Premier -208
ISO 500, 180 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 11
209
TFC vs CASL Premier -209
ISO 500, 120 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0
210
TFC vs CASL Premier -210
ISO 500, 120 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.0
211
TFC vs CASL Premier -211
ISO 500, 120 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 4.5
212
TFC vs CASL Premier -212
ISO 500, 148 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6
213
TFC vs CASL Premier -213
ISO 500, 148 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
214
TFC vs CASL Premier -214
ISO 500, 230 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6
215
TFC vs CASL Premier -215
ISO 500, 230 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6
216
TFC vs CASL Premier -216
ISO 500, 400 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 6.3
217
TFC vs CASL Premier -217
ISO 500, 400 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6
218
TFC vs CASL Premier -218
ISO 500, 400 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6
219
TFC vs CASL Premier -219
ISO 500, 250 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 8.0
220
TFC vs CASL Premier -220
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6
221
TFC vs CASL Premier -221
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6
222
TFC vs CASL Premier -222
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6
223
TFC vs CASL Premier -223
ISO 500, 320 mm, 1/640 sec at f / 5.6
224
TFC vs CASL Premier -224
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 5.6
225
TFC vs CASL Premier -225
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6
226
TFC vs CASL Premier -226
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6
227
TFC vs CASL Premier -227
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6
228
TFC vs CASL Premier -228
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1000 sec at f / 5.6
229
TFC vs CASL Premier -229
ISO 500, 210 mm, 1/1250 sec at f / 5.6
230
TFC vs CASL Premier -230
ISO 500, 180 mm, 1/1600 sec at f / 7.1